El Salvador vs Jamaica: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

El Salvador
6,511 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
27,962 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
4th
Jamaica rank
1st

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Jamaica
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019962023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 27,962 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 6,511 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 21,451 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 4.3 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1970 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 4th and Jamaica ranks 1st of 121 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Jamaica Difference Ahead
1970s 365.41 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 769.66 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 404.26 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 904.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 13,704 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 12,799 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 109.82 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 8,911 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 8,801 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 43.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 958.65 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 915.08 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 21.73 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 9,928 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 9,906 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 1,896 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 16,775 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 14,879 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 27,962 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 6,511 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Jamaica?
21,451 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Jamaica?
45 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Jamaica rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 4th and Jamaica ranks 1st of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Jamaica: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/jamaica/">El Salvador vs Jamaica: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.