Eswatini vs Rwanda: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Eswatini
1,407 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
2,248 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
29th
Rwanda rank
26th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Rwanda
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 2,248 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,407 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 841 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.6 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 29th and Rwanda ranks 26th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 27.17 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 99.99 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 72.82 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 120.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 52.35 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 67.99 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 13.79 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 155.65 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 141.86 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 13.64 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 124.72 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 111.08 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 7.72 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 65.77 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 58.05 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 433.75 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,651 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,217 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 2,248 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,407 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Rwanda?
841 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Rwanda?
41 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Rwanda rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 29th and Rwanda ranks 26th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Rwanda: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/rwanda/">Eswatini vs Rwanda: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.