Gambia vs Haiti: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Gambia
983.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Haiti
869.34 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
36th
Haiti rank
38th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Gambia
  • Haiti
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197119972023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 983.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 869.34 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Haiti, a difference of 114.19 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Haiti's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Haiti ahead.

Gambia ranks 36th and Haiti ranks 38th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 4 and Haiti in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Haiti Difference Ahead
1970s 120.5 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 121.52 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1.01 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Haiti
1980s 647.71 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 586.32 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 61.39 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 576.01 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 384.14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 191.87 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 253.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 339.28 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 85.71 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Haiti
2010s 381.45 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 116.42 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 265.04 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 647.2 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 606.63 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 40.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Gambia or Haiti?
Gambia, at 983.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 869.34 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Haiti as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Gambia and Haiti?
114.19 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Haiti?
49 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Haiti rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Gambia ranks 36th and Haiti ranks 38th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Haiti: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/haiti/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/haiti/">Gambia vs Haiti: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.