Grenada vs Jamaica: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Grenada
15,051 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
27,962 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Grenada rank
2nd
Jamaica rank
1st

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Grenada
  • Jamaica
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019962023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 27,962 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 15,051 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Grenada, a difference of 12,911 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.9 times Grenada's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 2nd and Jamaica ranks 1st of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Jamaica Difference Ahead
1970s 1,120 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,368 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 248.32 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 3,455 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 13,704 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 10,249 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 543.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 8,911 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 8,368 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 3,198 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 958.65 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,239 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2010s 7,726 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 9,928 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,201 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 10,009 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 16,775 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 6,767 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Grenada or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 27,962 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 15,051 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Grenada as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Grenada and Jamaica?
12,911 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Jamaica?
42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Grenada and Jamaica rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Grenada ranks 2nd and Jamaica ranks 1st of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Jamaica: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/grenada/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/grenada/jamaica/">Grenada vs Jamaica: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.