Grenada vs Mauritius: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Grenada
15,051 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
5,954 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Grenada rank
2nd
Mauritius rank
5th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Grenada
  • Mauritius
010.0k20.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 15,051 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 5,954 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 9,097 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Grenada's figure about 2.5 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Mauritius ahead.

Grenada ranks 2nd and Mauritius ranks 5th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 4 and Mauritius in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 1,400 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 834.66 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 565.35 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
1980s 3,455 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 19,254 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 15,799 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 543.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 11,876 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 11,333 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 3,198 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 279.08 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,919 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2010s 7,726 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 132.9 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7,593 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2020s 10,009 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,077 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7,931 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Grenada or Mauritius?
Grenada, at 15,051 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 5,954 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Grenada and Mauritius?
9,097 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mauritius?
41 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Grenada and Mauritius rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Grenada ranks 2nd and Mauritius ranks 5th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Mauritius: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/grenada/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/grenada/mauritius/">Grenada vs Mauritius: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.