Guatemala vs Solomon Islands: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
291.2 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
257.75 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
63rd
Solomon Islands rank
65th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Solomon Islands
0200400600197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 291.2 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 257.75 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 33.45 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 63rd and Solomon Islands ranks 65th of 121 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1980s 261.64 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 40.6 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 221.05 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 89.67 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 20.1 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 69.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 9.4 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 0.9171 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 8.48 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 5.15 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 64.23 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 59.08 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 101.07 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 80.97 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 20.1 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Solomon Islands?
Guatemala, at 291.2 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 257.75 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Solomon Islands?
33.45 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Solomon Islands?
35 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Solomon Islands rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 63rd and Solomon Islands ranks 65th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Solomon Islands: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/solomon-islands/">Guatemala vs Solomon Islands: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.