IDA only vs Sri Lanka: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

IDA only
168.4 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
4,492 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA only rank
11th
Sri Lanka rank
12th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • IDA only
  • Sri Lanka
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k197019962023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 4,492 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 168.4 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only, a difference of 4,324 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 26.7 times IDA only's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

IDA only ranks 11th and Sri Lanka ranks 12th of 12 groups.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA only Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 11.77 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 513.43 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 501.66 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 72.65 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,425 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,352 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 61.77 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,025 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 962.83 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 47.83 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,303 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,255 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 47.16 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 4,276 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 4,229 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 115.34 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,262 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,146 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, IDA only or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 4,492 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 168.4 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between IDA only and Sri Lanka?
4,324 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Sri Lanka?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do IDA only and Sri Lanka rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
IDA only ranks 11th and Sri Lanka ranks 12th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA only vs Sri Lanka: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-only/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-only/sri-lanka/">IDA only vs Sri Lanka: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.