Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Zimbabwe: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Iran, Islamic Republic of
152.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
133.98 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
80th
Zimbabwe rank
82nd

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Iran, Islamic Republic of
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300400198120022023

How they compare

Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 152.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 133.98 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 18.35 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iran, Islamic Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 82nd of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iran, Islamic Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran, Islamic Republic of Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 7.94 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 183.63 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 175.69 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 5.38 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 82.34 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 76.96 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 2.41 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 29.08 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 26.67 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 52.76 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 46.51 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 6.24 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Iran, Islamic Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Iran, Islamic Republic of or Zimbabwe?
Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 152.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 133.98 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Zimbabwe?
18.35 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Zimbabwe?
25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 82nd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Zimbabwe: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/iran-islamic-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/iran-islamic-rep/zimbabwe/">Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Zimbabwe: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.