Mauritania vs Somalia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Mauritania
17.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Somalia
16.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
118th
Somalia rank
119th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Somalia
0200400600197019962023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 17.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 16.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Somalia, a difference of 0.68 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 118th and Somalia ranks 119th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 4 and Somalia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Somalia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.5131 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 0.4984 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 0.0148 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
1980s 13.13 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 23.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 10.2 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Somalia
1990s 9.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1.32 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 8.01 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 7.14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1.11 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 6.03 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 7.72 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 0.3141 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7.4 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 15.71 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 141.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 126.14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Somalia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Somalia?
Mauritania, at 17.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 16.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Somalia as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Somalia?
0.68 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Somalia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Somalia rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 118th and Somalia ranks 119th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Somalia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/somalia-fed-rep/">Mauritania vs Somalia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.