Lower middle income vs Tunisia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP

Lower middle income
0.0027 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Tunisia
0.0143 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Lower middle income rank
3rd
Tunisia rank
5th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Lower middle income
  • Tunisia
00.0050.010.015197019972024

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.0143 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0027 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Lower middle income, a difference of 0.0116 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 5.3 times Lower middle income's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tunisia ahead.

Lower middle income ranks 3rd and Tunisia ranks 5th of 12 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Lower middle income averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lower middle income Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0018 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0026 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0008 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Tunisia
1980s 0.0049 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0022 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0026 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Lower middle income
1990s 0.003 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0041 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0011 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Tunisia
2000s 0.0009 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0004 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Lower middle income
2010s 0.0005 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0033 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0028 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Tunisia
2020s 0.0013 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0077 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0064 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per unit of gdp, Lower middle income or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.0143 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0027 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Lower middle income as of 2024.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per unit of gdp between Lower middle income and Tunisia?
0.0116 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Tunisia?
46 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Lower middle income and Tunisia rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Lower middle income ranks 3rd and Tunisia ranks 5th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lower middle income vs Tunisia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/lower-middle-income/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/lower-middle-income/tunisia/">Lower middle income vs Tunisia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 5,656 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.