Sao Tome and Principe vs Zambia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP

Sao Tome and Principe
0.0025 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zambia
0.0028 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe rank
56th
Zambia rank
53rd

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Zambia
00.20.40.6197019972024

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0028 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0025 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0003 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Zambia ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 56th and Zambia ranks 53rd of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0095 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0095 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
1980s 0 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.013 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.013 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
1990s 0.0013 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0726 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0713 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2000s 0.0013 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0099 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0086 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2010s 0.0017 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0016 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.002 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0015 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per unit of gdp, Sao Tome and Principe or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0028 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0025 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per unit of gdp between Sao Tome and Principe and Zambia?
0.0003 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Zambia?
39 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2024.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Zambia rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 56th and Zambia ranks 53rd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Zambia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/sao-tome-and-principe/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/sao-tome-and-principe/zambia/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Zambia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 5,656 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.