South Africa vs Sudan: Interest due, total long-term and short term, including IMF per BOP
South Africa
3.08 billion current US$
in 2011
Sudan
1.18 billion current US$
in 2009
South Africa rank
1st
Sudan rank
3rd
Interest due, total long-term and short term, including IMF per BOP over time
- South Africa
- Sudan
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 3.08 billion current US$ against 1.18 billion current US$ in Sudan, a difference of 1.90 billion current US$.
That makes South Africa's figure about 2.6 times Sudan's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 1st and Sudan ranks 3rd of 49 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher interest due, total long-term and short term, including imf per bop, South Africa or Sudan?
- South Africa, at 3.08 billion current US$ against 1.18 billion current US$ in Sudan as of 2011.
- What is the difference in interest due, total long-term and short term, including imf per bop between South Africa and Sudan?
- 1.90 billion current US$, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sudan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2009.
- How do South Africa and Sudan rank globally for interest due, total long-term and short term, including imf per bop?
- South Africa ranks 1st and Sudan ranks 3rd of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Interest due, total long-term and short term, including IMF per BOP (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Interest due is actual amounts of interest due in currency, goods, or services in the year specified.