Belgium vs Bermuda: Inward Direct investment, Assets (gross), Debt instruments, All
Inward Direct investment, Assets (gross), Debt instruments, All over time
- Belgium
- Bermuda
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 117.75 billion against 89.84 billion in Bermuda, a difference of 27.90 billion.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.3 times Bermuda's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 10th and Bermuda ranks 12th of 245 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Bermuda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.29 billion | 20.79 billion | 43.51 billion | Belgium |
| 2010s | 156.77 billion | 85.85 billion | 70.92 billion | Belgium |
| 2020s | 136.25 billion | 79.42 billion | 56.83 billion | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inward direct investment, assets (gross), debt instruments, all, Belgium or Bermuda?
- Belgium, at 117.75 billion against 89.84 billion in Bermuda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in inward direct investment, assets (gross), debt instruments, all between Belgium and Bermuda?
- 27.90 billion, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Bermuda?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Bermuda rank globally for inward direct investment, assets (gross), debt instruments, all?
- Belgium ranks 10th and Bermuda ranks 12th of 245 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Inward Direct investment, Assets (gross), Debt instruments, All entities (World, Derived using counterparty information). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Direct Investment Positions by Counterpart Economy dataset is based on information collected through an IMF-led global initiative on direct investment positions statistics (the Coordinated Direct Investment Survey, or CDIS). The purpose of this initiative is to enhance the quality and availability of direct investment position statistics by immediate counterpart economy and to support the objective of developing from-whom-to-whom cross-border data on direct investment positions. The DIP dataset includes (i) inward foreign direct investment positions by instrument (equity or debt) and by economy of immediate investor and (ii) outward direct investment positions by instrument (equity or debt) and by economy of immediate investment. In most instances the database contains separate data on net equity and net debt positions, as well as separate data on financial companies and fellow enterprises. The DIP dataset also includes mirror data which show values for the corresponding indicators as derived from data reported by the counterpart economies (referred to as data derived using counterparty information). These data can offer insights into inward and outward positions for economies that do not participate in the CDIS and/or do not collect direct investment positions by country or in total. For economies that do participate, these data can be used to cross-check and verify estimates and may help identify data gaps or errors at the counterpart economy level.