Botswana vs Congo: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
373.99 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
331.06 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
92nd
Congo rank
94th

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Congo
0200400600197019962023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 373.99 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 331.06 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 42.93 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Congo ahead.

Botswana ranks 92nd and Congo ranks 94th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Congo Difference Ahead
1970s 5.34 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 15.76 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 10.42 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 44.92 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 76.17 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 31.24 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 125.26 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 140.7 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 15.45 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 61.71 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 158.15 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 96.44 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 187.16 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 108.27 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 78.89 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 289.3 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 303.68 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 14.37 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Congo?
Botswana, at 373.99 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 331.06 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Congo?
42.93 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Congo rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 92nd and Congo ranks 94th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Congo: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-rep/">Botswana vs Congo: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.