Botswana vs Tanzania: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
373.99 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
446.14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
92nd
Tanzania rank
89th

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Tanzania
0100200300400197019962023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 446.14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 373.99 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 72.15 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tanzania ahead.

Botswana ranks 92nd and Tanzania ranks 89th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 5.34 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 9.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 4 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 44.92 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 54.58 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 9.66 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 125.26 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 110.84 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 14.42 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 61.71 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 56.35 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 5.35 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 187.16 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 114.91 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 72.26 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 289.3 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 345.28 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 55.98 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 446.14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 373.99 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Tanzania?
72.15 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Tanzania?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Tanzania rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 92nd and Tanzania ranks 89th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Tanzania: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/tanzania/">Botswana vs Tanzania: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.