Burundi vs Malawi: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Burundi
786.38 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
697.46 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
75th
Malawi rank
78th

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Burundi
  • Malawi
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197019962023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 786.38 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 697.46 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 88.92 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 75th and Malawi ranks 78th of 121 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 22.95 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 12.26 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 10.69 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 307.99 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 208.58 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 99.41 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
1990s 820.31 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 470.69 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 349.62 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 838.21 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 307.82 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 530.39 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2010s 378.44 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 247.23 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 131.21 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2020s 659.54 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 541.92 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 117.62 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Burundi or Malawi?
Burundi, at 786.38 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 697.46 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Burundi and Malawi?
88.92 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Malawi?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Malawi rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Burundi ranks 75th and Malawi ranks 78th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Malawi: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/malawi/">Burundi vs Malawi: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.