Comoros vs Eswatini: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Comoros
3,022 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
2,715 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Comoros rank
42nd
Eswatini rank
45th

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Comoros
  • Eswatini
05.0k10.0k15.0k197019962023

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 3,022 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,715 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 307 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Comoros's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Eswatini ahead.

Comoros ranks 42nd and Eswatini ranks 45th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 5.3 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 166.1 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 160.8 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 297.75 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 746.77 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 449.02 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 1,292 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,010 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 281.75 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Comoros
2000s 3,668 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,371 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,297 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Comoros
2010s 1,492 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,464 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 28.09 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Comoros
2020s 1,577 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,023 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 445.39 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Comoros or Eswatini?
Comoros, at 3,022 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,715 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Comoros and Eswatini?
307 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Eswatini?
46 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2023.
How do Comoros and Eswatini rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Comoros ranks 42nd and Eswatini ranks 45th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs Eswatini: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/comoros/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/comoros/eswatini/">Comoros vs Eswatini: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.