Dominica vs Low & middle income: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Dominica
19,560 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income
1,087 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
9th
Low & middle income rank
7th

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Dominica
  • Low & middle income
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197019962023

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 19,560 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,087 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 18,473 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Dominica's figure about 18.0 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 43 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.

Dominica ranks 9th and Low & middle income ranks 7th of 121 countries.

Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Low & middle income Difference Ahead
1980s 1,993 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 145.18 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,848 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 5,861 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 352.72 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 5,508 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 12,415 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 484.61 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 11,930 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 13,201 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 550.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 12,650 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2020s 16,628 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 830.95 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 15,797 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Dominica or Low & middle income?
Dominica, at 19,560 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,087 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Dominica and Low & middle income?
18,473 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Low & middle income?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Low & middle income rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Dominica ranks 9th and Low & middle income ranks 7th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Low & middle income: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominica/low-and-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominica/low-and-middle-income/">Dominica vs Low & middle income: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.