Ecuador vs Tunisia: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
6,585 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
7,285 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
26th
Tunisia rank
24th

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Tunisia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197019962023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 7,285 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 6,585 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 700 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 26th and Tunisia ranks 24th of 121 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 61.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 113.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 52.03 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 517.18 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 916.74 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 399.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 1,503 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,306 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,803 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 2,668 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 5,189 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,520 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 3,093 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 6,025 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,932 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 5,202 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7,121 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,919 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 7,285 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 6,585 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Tunisia?
700 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tunisia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Tunisia rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 26th and Tunisia ranks 24th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Tunisia: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/tunisia/">Ecuador vs Tunisia: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.