El Salvador vs Jamaica: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

El Salvador
37,331 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
35,451 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
6th
Jamaica rank
7th

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Jamaica
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019962023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 37,331 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 35,451 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 1,880 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 6th and Jamaica ranks 7th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Jamaica in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Jamaica Difference Ahead
1970s 543.39 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 784.06 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 240.66 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 2,503 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 8,078 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 5,576 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 7,494 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 18,310 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 10,816 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 16,138 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 18,007 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,868 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 24,111 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 20,577 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,534 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 28,509 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 26,883 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,626 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Jamaica?
El Salvador, at 37,331 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 35,451 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Jamaica?
1,880 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Jamaica?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Jamaica rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 6th and Jamaica ranks 7th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Jamaica: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/jamaica/">El Salvador vs Jamaica: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.