Guatemala vs Rwanda: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
5,250 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
4,954 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
30th
Rwanda rank
32nd

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Rwanda
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 5,250 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 4,954 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 296 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 30th and Rwanda ranks 32nd of 121 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 143.72 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 5.67 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 138.05 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 752.11 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 184.01 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 568.1 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 1,433 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 511.55 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 921.52 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 2,468 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 551.16 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,916 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 4,762 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 955.6 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,807 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 5,054 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,281 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,773 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Rwanda?
Guatemala, at 5,250 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 4,954 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Rwanda?
296 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Rwanda?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Rwanda rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 30th and Rwanda ranks 32nd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Rwanda: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/rwanda/">Guatemala vs Rwanda: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.