Guatemala vs Samoa: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
5,250 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
4,512 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
30th
Samoa rank
33rd

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Samoa
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 5,250 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 4,512 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 738 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 30th and Samoa ranks 33rd of 121 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Samoa Difference Ahead
1970s 179.37 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 58.48 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 120.89 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 752.11 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 493.34 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 258.77 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 1,433 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,276 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 156.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 2,468 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,064 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 403.84 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 4,762 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,844 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 917.74 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 5,054 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 4,654 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 399.83 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Samoa?
Guatemala, at 5,250 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 4,512 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Samoa?
738 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Samoa?
50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Samoa rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 30th and Samoa ranks 33rd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Samoa: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/samoa/">Guatemala vs Samoa: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.