IDA only vs Mauritius: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

IDA only
491.49 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
33,405 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA only rank
10th
Mauritius rank
8th

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • IDA only
  • Mauritius
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019962023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 33,405 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 491.49 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only, a difference of 32,914 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 68.0 times IDA only's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

IDA only ranks 10th and Mauritius ranks 8th of 12 groups.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA only Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 9.87 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 750.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 740.7 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 59.14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 10,793 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 10,734 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 141.22 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 22,690 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 22,549 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 149.46 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 19,541 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 19,391 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 216.06 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 29,882 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 29,666 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 412.09 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 55,541 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 55,129 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, IDA only or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 33,405 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 491.49 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between IDA only and Mauritius?
32,914 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Mauritius?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do IDA only and Mauritius rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
IDA only ranks 10th and Mauritius ranks 8th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA only vs Mauritius: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-only/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-only/mauritius/">IDA only vs Mauritius: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.