Jamaica vs Mauritius: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Jamaica
35,451 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
33,405 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
7th
Mauritius rank
8th

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Jamaica
  • Mauritius
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019962023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 35,451 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 33,405 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 2,046 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritius ahead.

Jamaica ranks 7th and Mauritius ranks 8th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 784.06 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 750.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 33.49 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 8,078 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 10,793 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,714 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 18,310 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 22,690 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 4,380 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 18,007 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 19,541 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,534 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 20,577 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 29,882 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 9,304 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 26,883 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 55,541 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 28,657 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Jamaica or Mauritius?
Jamaica, at 35,451 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 33,405 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Jamaica and Mauritius?
2,046 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mauritius?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Mauritius rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Jamaica ranks 7th and Mauritius ranks 8th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Mauritius: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/mauritius/">Jamaica vs Mauritius: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.