Jamaica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Jamaica
35,451 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
49,196 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Jamaica rank
7th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
4th

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Jamaica
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k197019962023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 49,196 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 35,451 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 13,745 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.4 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 7th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 4th of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 11,093 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,337 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7,756 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 18,310 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 9,449 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 8,861 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 18,007 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 31,288 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 13,281 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 17,337 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 49,196 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 31,859 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Jamaica or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 49,196 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 35,451 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2010.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Jamaica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
13,745 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
27 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2010.
How do Jamaica and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Jamaica ranks 7th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 4th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Jamaica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.