Low income vs Sri Lanka: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Low income
162.42 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
14,938 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income rank
12th
Sri Lanka rank
14th

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Low income
  • Sri Lanka
05.0k10.0k15.0k197019962023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 14,938 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 162.42 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 14,776 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 92.0 times Low income's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Low income ranks 12th and Sri Lanka ranks 14th of 12 groups.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 4.45 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 117.05 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 112.6 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 29.3 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 331.7 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 302.41 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 54.32 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 886.7 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 832.38 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 76.24 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,207 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,131 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 84.8 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 5,569 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 5,484 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 170 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 11,272 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 11,102 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Low income or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 14,938 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 162.42 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Low income and Sri Lanka?
14,776 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Sri Lanka?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Low income and Sri Lanka rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Low income ranks 12th and Sri Lanka ranks 14th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Sri Lanka: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/sri-lanka/">Low income vs Sri Lanka: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.