Mauritania vs Zambia: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Mauritania
208.62 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
207.16 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
99th
Zambia rank
100th

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Zambia
0200400600197019962023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 208.62 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 207.16 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 1.46 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Mauritania ranks 99th and Zambia ranks 100th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 2.32 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 24.68 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 22.36 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 28.6 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 72.13 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 43.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 63.08 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 206.98 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 143.9 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 43.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 59.44 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 15.88 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 147.01 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 43.65 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 103.36 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 215.66 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 159.44 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 56.23 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Zambia?
Mauritania, at 208.62 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 207.16 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Zambia?
1.46 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Zambia rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 99th and Zambia ranks 100th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Zambia: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/zambia/">Mauritania vs Zambia: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.