Mauritius vs Saint Lucia: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Mauritius
33,405 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Lucia
44,237 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
8th
Saint Lucia rank
5th

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Saint Lucia
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019962023

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 44,237 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 33,405 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 10,832 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.3 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 8th and Saint Lucia ranks 5th of 121 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 3 and Saint Lucia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1980s 11,639 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,433 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 9,206 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 22,690 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 11,313 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 11,377 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 19,541 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 21,978 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,437 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2010s 29,882 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 34,574 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 4,692 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2020s 55,541 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 36,829 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 18,711 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Mauritius or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 44,237 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 33,405 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Mauritius and Saint Lucia?
10,832 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Saint Lucia?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Saint Lucia rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 8th and Saint Lucia ranks 5th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Saint Lucia: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/st-lucia/">Mauritius vs Saint Lucia: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.