Nicaragua vs Pakistan: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Nicaragua
4,377 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
3,797 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua rank
36th
Pakistan rank
39th

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Pakistan
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197019962023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 4,377 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,797 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 580 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 36th and Pakistan ranks 39th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 133.63 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 83.58 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 50.05 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 282.88 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 255.32 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 27.55 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 915.09 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,084 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 169.14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 553.05 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,612 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,059 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 990.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,014 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,023 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 3,140 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,442 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 301.96 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Nicaragua or Pakistan?
Nicaragua, at 4,377 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,797 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Nicaragua and Pakistan?
580 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Pakistan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Pakistan rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Nicaragua ranks 36th and Pakistan ranks 39th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Pakistan: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/pakistan/">Nicaragua vs Pakistan: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,094 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.