Lower middle income vs Nicaragua: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP

Lower middle income
0.0069 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Nicaragua
0.0289 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Lower middle income rank
2nd
Nicaragua rank
2nd

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Lower middle income
  • Nicaragua
00.050.10.150.20.25197019972024

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0.0289 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0069 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Lower middle income, a difference of 0.022 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 4.2 times Lower middle income's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Lower middle income ranks 2nd and Nicaragua ranks 2nd of 12 groups.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lower middle income Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0019 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0112 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0093 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
1980s 0.0045 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0134 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0089 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
1990s 0.0101 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0459 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0358 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
2000s 0.0065 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0104 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.004 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
2010s 0.0032 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0097 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0066 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
2020s 0.005 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0256 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0206 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per unit of gdp, Lower middle income or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 0.0289 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0069 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Lower middle income as of 2024.
What is the difference in multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per unit of gdp between Lower middle income and Nicaragua?
0.022 TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Nicaragua?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Lower middle income and Nicaragua rank globally for multilateral debt service (tds, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Lower middle income ranks 2nd and Nicaragua ranks 2nd of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lower middle income vs Nicaragua: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/lower-middle-income/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/multilateral-debt-service-tds-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/lower-middle-income/nicaragua/">Lower middle income vs Nicaragua: Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
TDS, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 6,196 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.