Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled

Bangladesh
3.18 billion NFL, current US$
in 2024
IDA only
9.06 billion NFL, current US$
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
3rd
IDA only rank
1st

Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Bangladesh
  • IDA only
02.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B197019972024

How they compare

IDA only currently reports 9.06 billion NFL, current US$ against 3.18 billion NFL, current US$ in Bangladesh, a difference of 5.88 billion NFL, current US$.

That makes IDA only's figure about 2.8 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1972 it was IDA only ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 3rd and IDA only ranks 1st of 122 countries.

IDA only has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh IDA only Difference Ahead
1970s 222.66 million NFL, current US$ 1.61 billion NFL, current US$ 1.39 billion NFL, current US$ IDA only
1980s 253.49 million NFL, current US$ 4.62 billion NFL, current US$ 4.37 billion NFL, current US$ IDA only
1990s -50.56 million NFL, current US$ 874.66 million NFL, current US$ 925.22 million NFL, current US$ IDA only
2000s -64.63 million NFL, current US$ 714.69 million NFL, current US$ 779.31 million NFL, current US$ IDA only
2010s 1.09 billion NFL, current US$ 8.01 billion NFL, current US$ 6.92 billion NFL, current US$ IDA only
2020s 4.24 billion NFL, current US$ 8.40 billion NFL, current US$ 4.16 billion NFL, current US$ IDA only

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled, Bangladesh or IDA only?
IDA only, at 9.06 billion NFL, current US$ against 3.18 billion NFL, current US$ in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled between Bangladesh and IDA only?
5.88 billion NFL, current US$, with IDA only ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and IDA only?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and IDA only rank globally for net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled?
Bangladesh ranks 3rd and IDA only ranks 1st of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us-gaps-filled/bangladesh/ida-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us-gaps-filled/bangladesh/ida-only/">Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 6,372 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$) with 51 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.