China vs Congo: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled

China
-253.61 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
Congo
-223.53 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
China rank
108th
Congo rank
106th

Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • China
  • Congo
-4.0B-2.0B02.0B4.0B6.0B197019972024

How they compare

Congo currently reports -223.53 million NFL, current US$ against -253.61 million NFL, current US$ in China, a difference of 30.08 million NFL, current US$.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1981 it was China ahead.

China ranks 108th and Congo ranks 106th of 122 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Congo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Congo Difference Ahead
1980s 538.50 million NFL, current US$ 57.31 million NFL, current US$ 481.19 million NFL, current US$ China
1990s 1.73 billion NFL, current US$ 7.66 million NFL, current US$ 1.72 billion NFL, current US$ China
2000s 289.33 million NFL, current US$ -5.27 million NFL, current US$ 294.59 million NFL, current US$ China
2010s -2.03 billion NFL, current US$ 307.09 million NFL, current US$ 2.33 billion NFL, current US$ Congo
2020s -993.53 million NFL, current US$ -195.57 million NFL, current US$ 797.96 million NFL, current US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled, China or Congo?
Congo, at -223.53 million NFL, current US$ against -253.61 million NFL, current US$ in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled between China and Congo?
30.08 million NFL, current US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Congo?
44 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2024.
How do China and Congo rank globally for net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled?
China ranks 108th and Congo ranks 106th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Congo: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us-gaps-filled/china/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us-gaps-filled/china/congo-rep/">China vs Congo: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 6,372 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$) with 51 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.