Colombia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled

Colombia
33.14 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
45.42 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
Colombia rank
41st
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
38th

Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Colombia
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
-1.0B01.0B2.0B3.0B197019972024

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 45.42 million NFL, current US$ against 33.14 million NFL, current US$ in Colombia, a difference of 12.28 million NFL, current US$.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.4 times Colombia's.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 41st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 38th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 41.61 million NFL, current US$ 177.29 million NFL, current US$ 135.69 million NFL, current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 85.59 million NFL, current US$ 121.84 million NFL, current US$ 36.25 million NFL, current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s -47.37 million NFL, current US$ 9.81 million NFL, current US$ 57.18 million NFL, current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s -86.33 million NFL, current US$ 5.54 million NFL, current US$ 91.88 million NFL, current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 520.99 million NFL, current US$ 382.86 million NFL, current US$ 138.13 million NFL, current US$ Colombia
2020s 1.65 million NFL, current US$ -66.29 million NFL, current US$ 67.94 million NFL, current US$ Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled, Colombia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 45.42 million NFL, current US$ against 33.14 million NFL, current US$ in Colombia as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled between Colombia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
12.28 million NFL, current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Colombia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled?
Colombia ranks 41st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 38th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us-gaps-filled/colombia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us-gaps-filled/colombia/tanzania/">Colombia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 6,372 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$) with 51 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.