Papua New Guinea vs Serbia: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled

Papua New Guinea
257.15 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
Serbia
328.95 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
20th
Serbia rank
18th

Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Serbia
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B1.5B197019972024

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 328.95 million NFL, current US$ against 257.15 million NFL, current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 71.79 million NFL, current US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Serbia ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 20th and Serbia ranks 18th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Serbia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Serbia Difference Ahead
1970s 2.93 million NFL, current US$ 126.50 million NFL, current US$ 123.57 million NFL, current US$ Serbia
1980s 21.20 million NFL, current US$ -53.22 million NFL, current US$ 74.41 million NFL, current US$ Papua New Guinea
1990s 23.25 million NFL, current US$ -143.80 million NFL, current US$ 167.05 million NFL, current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s -23.79 million NFL, current US$ 104.66 million NFL, current US$ 128.45 million NFL, current US$ Serbia
2010s 107.83 million NFL, current US$ 336.58 million NFL, current US$ 228.75 million NFL, current US$ Serbia
2020s 500.54 million NFL, current US$ 439.20 million NFL, current US$ 61.34 million NFL, current US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled, Papua New Guinea or Serbia?
Serbia, at 328.95 million NFL, current US$ against 257.15 million NFL, current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled between Papua New Guinea and Serbia?
71.79 million NFL, current US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Serbia?
50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Serbia rank globally for net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled?
Papua New Guinea ranks 20th and Serbia ranks 18th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Serbia: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us-gaps-filled/papua-new-guinea/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us-gaps-filled/papua-new-guinea/serbia/">Papua New Guinea vs Serbia: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 6,372 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$) with 51 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.