Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled

Tanzania, United Republic of
45.42 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
Zimbabwe
52.53 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
38th
Zimbabwe rank
37th

Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Zimbabwe
-250.0M0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B197019972024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 52.53 million NFL, current US$ against 45.42 million NFL, current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 7.11 million NFL, current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Tanzania, United Republic of averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 177.29 million NFL, current US$ -1.76 million NFL, current US$ 179.05 million NFL, current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 121.84 million NFL, current US$ 72.15 million NFL, current US$ 49.69 million NFL, current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 9.81 million NFL, current US$ 38.57 million NFL, current US$ 28.77 million NFL, current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 5.54 million NFL, current US$ 35.16 million NFL, current US$ 29.61 million NFL, current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 382.86 million NFL, current US$ 130.12 million NFL, current US$ 252.74 million NFL, current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s -66.29 million NFL, current US$ 107.88 million NFL, current US$ 174.17 million NFL, current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled, Tanzania, United Republic of or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 52.53 million NFL, current US$ against 45.42 million NFL, current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled between Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
7.11 million NFL, current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for net financial flows, bilateral (nfl, current us$), gaps filled?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us-gaps-filled/tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us-gaps-filled/tanzania/zimbabwe/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 6,372 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$) with 51 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.