Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net financial flows, bilateral

Bangladesh
3.18 billion NFL, current US$
in 2024
IDA only
9.06 billion NFL, current US$
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
3rd
IDA only rank
1st

Net financial flows, bilateral over time

  • Bangladesh
  • IDA only
02.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B197019972024

How they compare

IDA only currently reports 9.06 billion NFL, current US$ against 3.18 billion NFL, current US$ in Bangladesh, a difference of 5.88 billion NFL, current US$.

That makes IDA only's figure about 2.8 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1972 it was IDA only ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 3rd and IDA only ranks 1st of 122 countries.

IDA only has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh IDA only Difference Ahead
1970s 222.66 million NFL, current US$ 1.61 billion NFL, current US$ 1.39 billion NFL, current US$ IDA only
1980s 253.49 million NFL, current US$ 4.62 billion NFL, current US$ 4.37 billion NFL, current US$ IDA only
1990s -50.56 million NFL, current US$ 874.66 million NFL, current US$ 925.22 million NFL, current US$ IDA only
2000s -64.63 million NFL, current US$ 714.69 million NFL, current US$ 779.31 million NFL, current US$ IDA only
2010s 1.09 billion NFL, current US$ 8.01 billion NFL, current US$ 6.92 billion NFL, current US$ IDA only
2020s 4.24 billion NFL, current US$ 8.40 billion NFL, current US$ 4.16 billion NFL, current US$ IDA only

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, bilateral, Bangladesh or IDA only?
IDA only, at 9.06 billion NFL, current US$ against 3.18 billion NFL, current US$ in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, bilateral between Bangladesh and IDA only?
5.88 billion NFL, current US$, with IDA only ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and IDA only?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and IDA only rank globally for net financial flows, bilateral?
Bangladesh ranks 3rd and IDA only ranks 1st of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net financial flows, bilateral. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us/bangladesh/ida-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us/bangladesh/ida-only/">Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net financial flows, bilateral</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
134 places, 6,321 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Net flows (or net lending or net disbursements) received by the borrower during the year are disbursements minus principal repayments. Data are in current U.S. dollars.