China vs Congo: Net financial flows, bilateral

China
-253.61 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
Congo
-223.53 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
China rank
109th
Congo rank
107th

Net financial flows, bilateral over time

  • China
  • Congo
-4.0B-2.0B02.0B4.0B6.0B197019972024

How they compare

Congo currently reports -223.53 million NFL, current US$ against -253.61 million NFL, current US$ in China, a difference of 30.08 million NFL, current US$.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1981 it was China ahead.

China ranks 109th and Congo ranks 107th of 123 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Congo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Congo Difference Ahead
1980s 538.50 million NFL, current US$ 57.31 million NFL, current US$ 481.19 million NFL, current US$ China
1990s 1.73 billion NFL, current US$ 7.66 million NFL, current US$ 1.72 billion NFL, current US$ China
2000s 289.33 million NFL, current US$ -5.27 million NFL, current US$ 294.59 million NFL, current US$ China
2010s -2.03 billion NFL, current US$ 307.09 million NFL, current US$ 2.33 billion NFL, current US$ Congo
2020s -993.53 million NFL, current US$ -195.57 million NFL, current US$ 797.96 million NFL, current US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, bilateral, China or Congo?
Congo, at -223.53 million NFL, current US$ against -253.61 million NFL, current US$ in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, bilateral between China and Congo?
30.08 million NFL, current US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Congo?
44 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2024.
How do China and Congo rank globally for net financial flows, bilateral?
China ranks 109th and Congo ranks 107th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Congo: Net financial flows, bilateral. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us/china/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us/china/congo-rep/">China vs Congo: Net financial flows, bilateral</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
135 places, 6,334 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Net flows (or net lending or net disbursements) received by the borrower during the year are disbursements minus principal repayments. Data are in current U.S. dollars.