Papua New Guinea vs Serbia: Net financial flows, bilateral

Papua New Guinea
257.15 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
Serbia
328.95 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
20th
Serbia rank
18th

Net financial flows, bilateral over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Serbia
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B1.5B197019972024

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 328.95 million NFL, current US$ against 257.15 million NFL, current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 71.79 million NFL, current US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Serbia ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 20th and Serbia ranks 18th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Serbia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Serbia Difference Ahead
1970s 2.93 million NFL, current US$ 126.50 million NFL, current US$ 123.57 million NFL, current US$ Serbia
1980s 21.20 million NFL, current US$ -53.22 million NFL, current US$ 74.41 million NFL, current US$ Papua New Guinea
1990s 23.25 million NFL, current US$ -143.80 million NFL, current US$ 167.05 million NFL, current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s -23.79 million NFL, current US$ 104.66 million NFL, current US$ 128.45 million NFL, current US$ Serbia
2010s 107.83 million NFL, current US$ 336.58 million NFL, current US$ 228.75 million NFL, current US$ Serbia
2020s 500.54 million NFL, current US$ 439.20 million NFL, current US$ 61.34 million NFL, current US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, bilateral, Papua New Guinea or Serbia?
Serbia, at 328.95 million NFL, current US$ against 257.15 million NFL, current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, bilateral between Papua New Guinea and Serbia?
71.79 million NFL, current US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Serbia?
50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Serbia rank globally for net financial flows, bilateral?
Papua New Guinea ranks 20th and Serbia ranks 18th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Serbia: Net financial flows, bilateral. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us/papua-new-guinea/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-bilateral-nfl-current-us/papua-new-guinea/serbia/">Papua New Guinea vs Serbia: Net financial flows, bilateral</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
134 places, 6,321 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Net flows (or net lending or net disbursements) received by the borrower during the year are disbursements minus principal repayments. Data are in current U.S. dollars.