Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita

Ecuador
-0.0037 NFL, current US$ per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
-0.0026 NFL, current US$ per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
70th
Zimbabwe rank
69th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
0246810197019972024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports -0.0026 NFL, current US$ per person against -0.0037 NFL, current US$ per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0011 NFL, current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Ecuador ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 69th of 116 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s -0.046 NFL, current US$ per person 0.8077 NFL, current US$ per person 0.8537 NFL, current US$ per person Zimbabwe
1990s -0.0937 NFL, current US$ per person 3.97 NFL, current US$ per person 4.06 NFL, current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2000s -0.0826 NFL, current US$ per person 0.0471 NFL, current US$ per person 0.1297 NFL, current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2010s -0.058 NFL, current US$ per person -0.0213 NFL, current US$ per person 0.0367 NFL, current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2020s -0.0168 NFL, current US$ per person -0.0268 NFL, current US$ per person 0.0101 NFL, current US$ per person Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per capita, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at -0.0026 NFL, current US$ per person against -0.0037 NFL, current US$ per person in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per capita between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
0.0011 NFL, current US$ per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
39 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per capita?
Ecuador ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 69th of 116 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-capita/ecuador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-capita/ecuador/zimbabwe/">Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita
Unit
NFL, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
153 places, 7,042 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.