Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Serbia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
-1.72 NFL, current US$ per person
in 2015
Serbia
-3.13 NFL, current US$ per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
102nd
Serbia rank
105th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
  • Serbia
-1001020198520042024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of currently reports -1.72 NFL, current US$ per person against -3.13 NFL, current US$ per person in Serbia, a difference of 1.41 NFL, current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Serbia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 102nd and Serbia ranks 105th of 116 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s -1.1 NFL, current US$ per person 9.15 NFL, current US$ per person 10.25 NFL, current US$ per person Serbia
2010s -1.59 NFL, current US$ per person -2.01 NFL, current US$ per person 0.4214 NFL, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per capita, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of or Serbia?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, at -1.72 NFL, current US$ per person against -3.13 NFL, current US$ per person in Serbia as of 2015.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per capita between Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Serbia?
1.41 NFL, current US$ per person, with Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Serbia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2015.
How do Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Serbia rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per capita?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 102nd and Serbia ranks 105th of 116 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Serbia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/serbia/">Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Serbia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per capita
Unit
NFL, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
153 places, 7,042 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.