Africa Eastern and Southern vs Malawi: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP

Africa Eastern and Southern
0.0045 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malawi
0.0175 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
10th
Malawi rank
11th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Malawi
00.010.020.030.040.05197019972024

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0175 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0045 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 0.013 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malawi's figure about 3.9 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malawi ahead.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 10th and Malawi ranks 11th of 37 groups.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Malawi Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0034 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0251 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0216 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Malawi
1990s 0.0046 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0348 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0302 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Malawi
2000s 0.0036 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0119 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0083 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Malawi
2010s 0.0029 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0092 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0063 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Malawi
2020s 0.004 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0133 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0093 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp, Africa Eastern and Southern or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.0175 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0045 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp between Africa Eastern and Southern and Malawi?
0.013 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Malawi?
45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Malawi rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 10th and Malawi ranks 11th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Malawi: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/africa-eastern-and-southern/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/africa-eastern-and-southern/malawi/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Malawi: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
153 places, 6,820 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.