How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Viet Nam?

39 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burundi vs Viet Nam: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP

Burundi

-0.0018 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Viet Nam

-0.0012 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Burundi rank

109th

Viet Nam rank

106th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

Burundi
Viet Nam

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports -0.0012 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against -0.0018 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Burundi, a difference of 0.0006 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 109th and Viet Nam ranks 106th of 116 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 3 and Viet Nam in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burundi	Viet Nam	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.0317 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0002 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0315 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Burundi
1990s	0.0262 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0039 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0223 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Burundi
2000s	0.0198 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0082 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0116 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Burundi
2010s	0.0008 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0038 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0031 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Viet Nam
2020s	-0.0013 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	-0.0004 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0009 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp, Burundi or Viet Nam?: Viet Nam, at -0.0012 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against -0.0018 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Burundi as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp between Burundi and Viet Nam?: 0.0006 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Viet Nam?: 39 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2024.
How do Burundi and Viet Nam rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp?: Burundi ranks 109th and Viet Nam ranks 106th of 116 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Viet Nam: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/viet-nam/">Burundi vs Viet Nam: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 153 places, 6,820 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 19 August 2026

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.