How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Zambia?

42 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cape Verde vs Zambia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP

Cape Verde

0.0134 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Zambia

0.0132 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Cape Verde rank

16th

Zambia rank

17th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

Cape Verde
Zambia

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 0.0134 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0132 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Zambia, a difference of 0.0002 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Zambia ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 17th of 116 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cape Verde	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.0072 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0145 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0074 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Zambia
1990s	0.0164 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0419 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0254 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Zambia
2000s	0.0185 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0179 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0006 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Cape Verde
2010s	0.0058 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0032 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0026 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Cape Verde
2020s	0.0227 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0115 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0112 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp, Cape Verde or Zambia?: Cape Verde, at 0.0134 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0132 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp between Cape Verde and Zambia?: 0.0002 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Zambia?: 42 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2024.
How do Cape Verde and Zambia rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp?: Cape Verde ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 17th of 116 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Zambia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cabo-verde/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cabo-verde/zambia/">Cape Verde vs Zambia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 153 places, 6,820 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 19 August 2026

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.