Early-demographic dividend vs Ghana: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP

Early-demographic dividend
0.0003 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Ghana
0.0101 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Early-demographic dividend rank
21st
Ghana rank
19th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Ghana
00.010.020.030.04197019972024

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 0.0101 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0098 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Ghana's figure about 38.6 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ghana ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 21st and Ghana ranks 19th of 37 groups.

Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Ghana Difference Ahead
1970s 0.001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0029 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0019 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Ghana
1980s 0.0011 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0174 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0163 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Ghana
1990s 0.0008 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0316 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0308 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Ghana
2000s 0.0005 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0197 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0191 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Ghana
2010s 0.0003 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0058 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0055 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Ghana
2020s 0.0003 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0058 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0055 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp, Early-demographic dividend or Ghana?
Ghana, at 0.0101 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp between Early-demographic dividend and Ghana?
0.0098 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Ghana?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Ghana rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 21st and Ghana ranks 19th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Ghana: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/ghana/">Early-demographic dividend vs Ghana: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
153 places, 6,820 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.