Latin America & Caribbean vs Nepal: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP

Latin America & Caribbean
0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Nepal
0.0067 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latin America & Caribbean rank
29th
Nepal rank
28th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Nepal
00.010.020.03197019972024

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.0067 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 0.0066 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Nepal's figure about 133.5 times Latin America & Caribbean's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nepal ahead.

Latin America & Caribbean ranks 29th and Nepal ranks 28th of 37 groups.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & Caribbean Nepal Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0033 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0032 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
1980s 0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0177 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0176 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
1990s 0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.014 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0138 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
2000s 0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.003 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0029 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
2010s 0 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0053 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0053 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
2020s 0 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0102 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0101 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp, Latin America & Caribbean or Nepal?
Nepal, at 0.0067 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Latin America & Caribbean as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp between Latin America & Caribbean and Nepal?
0.0066 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean and Nepal?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Latin America & Caribbean and Nepal rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 29th and Nepal ranks 28th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & Caribbean vs Nepal: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/latin-america-and-caribbean/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/latin-america-and-caribbean/nepal/">Latin America & Caribbean vs Nepal: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
153 places, 6,820 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.