Lesotho vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP

Lesotho
0.026 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa
0.0058 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Lesotho rank
3rd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
5th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Lesotho
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
00.010.020.03197019972024

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 0.026 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0058 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.0202 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 4.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Lesotho ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th of 116 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0113 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0014 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0099 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Lesotho
1980s 0.0196 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0033 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0163 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Lesotho
1990s 0.0101 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0049 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0052 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Lesotho
2000s 0.008 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0037 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0044 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Lesotho
2010s 0.0038 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0028 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Lesotho
2020s 0.0147 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0045 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0102 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp, Lesotho or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Lesotho, at 0.026 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0058 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp between Lesotho and Sub-Saharan Africa?
0.0202 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Sub-Saharan Africa?
52 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2024.
How do Lesotho and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Lesotho ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th of 116 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/lesotho/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/lesotho/sub-saharan-africa/">Lesotho vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
153 places, 6,820 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.