Lower middle income vs Zambia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP

Lower middle income
0.0013 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zambia
0.0132 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Lower middle income rank
14th
Zambia rank
17th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Lower middle income
  • Zambia
00.020.040.06197019972024

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0132 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0013 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Lower middle income, a difference of 0.0119 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zambia's figure about 10.1 times Lower middle income's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Lower middle income ahead.

Lower middle income ranks 14th and Zambia ranks 17th of 37 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Lower middle income averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lower middle income Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0025 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0023 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Lower middle income
1980s 0.0029 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0105 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0075 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
1990s 0.0034 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0419 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0385 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2000s 0.0019 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0179 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.016 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2010s 0.0011 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0032 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0021 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2020s 0.0013 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0115 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0101 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp, Lower middle income or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0132 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0013 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Lower middle income as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp between Lower middle income and Zambia?
0.0119 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Zambia?
46 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2024.
How do Lower middle income and Zambia rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Lower middle income ranks 14th and Zambia ranks 17th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lower middle income vs Zambia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/lower-middle-income/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/lower-middle-income/zambia/">Lower middle income vs Zambia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
153 places, 6,820 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.