Other small states vs Zambia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP

Other small states
0.0003 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zambia
0.0132 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Other small states rank
19th
Zambia rank
17th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Other small states
  • Zambia
00.020.040.06197519992024

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0132 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Other small states, a difference of 0.0129 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zambia's figure about 38.1 times Other small states's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 46 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Other small states ahead.

Other small states ranks 19th and Zambia ranks 17th of 37 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Other small states averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Other small states Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0002 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Other small states
1980s 0.0004 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0105 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.01 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
1990s 0.0006 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0419 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0413 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2000s 0.0006 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0179 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0173 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2010s 0.0002 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0032 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.003 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2020s 0.0007 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0115 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0108 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp, Other small states or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0132 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Other small states as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp between Other small states and Zambia?
0.0129 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Other small states and Zambia?
46 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2024.
How do Other small states and Zambia rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Other small states ranks 19th and Zambia ranks 17th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Other small states vs Zambia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/other-small-states/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/other-small-states/zambia/">Other small states vs Zambia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
153 places, 6,820 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.