Pre-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP

Pre-demographic dividend
0.0058 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Rwanda
0.0371 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Pre-demographic dividend rank
3rd
Rwanda rank
1st

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Pre-demographic dividend
  • Rwanda
00.010.020.030.04197019972024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0371 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0058 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0313 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 6.4 times Pre-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Pre-demographic dividend ahead.

Pre-demographic dividend ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 1st of 37 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pre-demographic dividend Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0014 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0079 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0065 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1980s 0.0034 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0128 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0094 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1990s 0.0068 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0217 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0148 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2000s 0.0044 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0167 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0123 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2010s 0.0026 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0196 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.017 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0.0046 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0308 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0262 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp, Pre-demographic dividend or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.0371 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0058 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp between Pre-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
0.0313 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pre-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Pre-demographic dividend and Rwanda rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Pre-demographic dividend ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 1st of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pre-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/pre-demographic-dividend/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/pre-demographic-dividend/rwanda/">Pre-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
153 places, 6,820 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.