Pre-demographic dividend vs Saint Lucia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP

Pre-demographic dividend
0.0058 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Saint Lucia
0.0229 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Pre-demographic dividend rank
3rd
Saint Lucia rank
6th

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Pre-demographic dividend
  • Saint Lucia
00.0050.010.0150.020.025197019972024

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 0.0229 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0058 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0171 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 3.9 times Pre-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Pre-demographic dividend ahead.

Pre-demographic dividend ranks 3rd and Saint Lucia ranks 6th of 37 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Pre-demographic dividend averaged higher in 3 and Saint Lucia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pre-demographic dividend Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0071 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0018 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0053 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Pre-demographic dividend
2000s 0.0044 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.003 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0014 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Pre-demographic dividend
2010s 0.0026 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0025 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Pre-demographic dividend
2020s 0.0046 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.014 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0095 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp, Pre-demographic dividend or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 0.0229 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0058 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp between Pre-demographic dividend and Saint Lucia?
0.0171 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pre-demographic dividend and Saint Lucia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Pre-demographic dividend and Saint Lucia rank globally for net financial flows, ida (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Pre-demographic dividend ranks 3rd and Saint Lucia ranks 6th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pre-demographic dividend vs Saint Lucia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/pre-demographic-dividend/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/pre-demographic-dividend/st-lucia/">Pre-demographic dividend vs Saint Lucia: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
153 places, 6,820 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.